>>> Mantas Mikulenas <grawity@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 28.01.2022 um 10:27 in Nachricht <CAPWNY8U8wQxPh2enZ-WTnaRjFoPUt8SpeFMUiqX8x+rAet9csg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:50 AM Ulrich Windl < > Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> When upgrading SLES15 to SP3, a newer version of systemd was installed >> (246.16+suse.191.g3850086c65). >> Since then I see new journal messages like these that I cannot associate >> with a unit: >> >> Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 systemd[1]: var-tmp-AP_0xC5KDJP.mount: Succeeded. >> Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 systemd[22591]: var-tmp-AP_0xC5KDJP.mount: Succeeded. >> >> Where do these messages originate from, and couldn't they be improved? Or >> is it some debug-leftover? >> I do not see corresponding names in /var/tmp. >> > > If I understand correctly, the messages indicate that the filesystem was > *unmounted*, and the same program which did mounting/unmounting immediately > cleaned up the mountpoint as well. > > (systemd reacts to external mounts as those also contribute to > dependencies.) > > If OpenSuSE has the kernel audit subsystem enabled, try using `auditctl` to > monitor a) what process executes mount-related syscalls, b) what process > creates directories under /var/tmp. Thanks, probably these messages are related to mounting a virtual CD, as nearby are these messages: Jan 27 09:29:29 h16 kernel: ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3 Jan 27 09:29:29 h16 kernel: ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 systemd[1]: var-tmp-AP_0xC5KDJP.mount: Succeeded. Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 systemd[22591]: var-tmp-AP_0xC5KDJP.mount: Succeeded. Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 kernel: ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3 Jan 27 09:29:30 h16 kernel: ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A Jan 27 09:29:31 h16 systemd[22591]: var-tmp-AP_0x6tWaHS.mount: Succeeded. Jan 27 09:29:31 h16 systemd[1]: var-tmp-AP_0x6tWaHS.mount: Succeeded. Still I wonder what this is all about (systemd finding a CD, mounting it, just to find out that no-one needs it?)... > > -- > Mantas Mikulėnas