Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
From
: Michael Biebl <mbiebl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:16:43 +0200
Cc
: "systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
59ff1394-7715-e40a-cbce-ec6e02e30f2d@gmail.com
>
References
: <
83597df0-fef1-049e-3707-2aa2a3819fb9@gmail.com
> <
611A4E62020000A1000433A3@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de
> <
59ff1394-7715-e40a-cbce-ec6e02e30f2d@gmail.com
>
How exactly do you rename your interfaces? Do you use a udev rule? Can you post those scripts/rules?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
From:
Amish
References
:
Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
From:
Amish
Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
From:
Ulrich Windl
Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
From:
Amish
Prev by Date:
Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
Next by Date:
Can't manage to start a task when bluetooth is ready with systemd
Previous by thread:
Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
Next by thread:
Re: Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[LARTC]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Photo]