Re: consider dropping defrag of journals on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering writes:

> inode, and then donate the old blocks over. This means the inode nr
> changes, which is something I don't like. Semantically it's only
> marginally better than just creating a new file from scratch.

Wait, what do you mean the inode nr changes?  I thought the whole point
of the block donating thing was that you get a contiguous set of blocks
in the new file, then transfer those blocks back to the old inode so
that the inode number and timestamps of the file don't change.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux