Re: Why systemd-nspawn is slower than docker, podman and qemu?! how to Improve nspawn performance?

[Badr Elmers <badrelmers@xxxxxxxxx>]

Problem solved, as  Mantas Mikulėnas said I had to use  export
SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0, because nspawn will still be processing syscalls
when I whitelist them with  --system-call-filter. and I was using
systemd v241 of debian buster but SYSTEMD_SECCOMP was added in systemd
v247 (so it had no effect when I first test it) .
now nspawn is as quick as the baremetal host, perf and even the
context switch benchmark improved and now it is as the baremetal.

This is what I used (need systemd v247):
export SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0
systemd-nspawn --capability=all --private-users=false -D ./bbusterboot --boot

Thank you very much for your help.
badr


On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:56:09AM +0100, Badr Elmers wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Why nspawn is slow compared to docker podman and even qemu?!
> > CPU tasks take twice of the time it takes in docker, podman or qemu
> >
> > here I filled a request to improve nspawn performance which contain the
> > steps and the full test result:
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/18370
> >
> > Do you know why systemd-nspawn is slower? how can I improve it?
>
> As I pointed out in the above "issue", the benchmark isn't measuring
> what anyone thinks it is measuring and should not be treated as a
> reliable indication of anything.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel