Lennart Poettering wrote: > Martin wrote: >> Ah. Thanks for the explanation. Adding >> Wants=first.target second.target > > Hmm, what? > > After=/Before= are the ordering deps, Wants= is a requirement dep. > >> Respectfully suggest that the documentation bug should be fixed! > >I am sorry, what? So, this did not work: #----- /etc/systemd/system/first.target -----# [Unit] Description=Started first Wants=third.service #----- /etc/systemd/system/second.target -----# [Unit] Description=Started second Wants=third.service #----- /etc/systemd/system/third.service -----# [Unit] Description=Third service Requisite=first.target second.target [Service] <...> The third.service started as soon as *either* the first.target or second.target was started, even though it has *both* of them as Requisites, and as previously quoted, the manual, https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html#Requisite =, says: | Requisite= | | Similar to Requires=. However, if the units listed here are not | started already, they will not be started and the starting of | this unit will fail immediately. Bluntly, that does not appear to be true. It is a documentation bug, or at least poorly worded. If first.target is started (which has Wants=third.service), but second.target is not, then how is it that third.service's "Requisite=second.target" does not cause "the starting of third.service to fail immediately"? Following Andrei's suggestion, I changed third.service to: #----- /etc/systemd/system/third.service -----# [Unit] Description=Third service Requisite=first.target second.target After=first.target second.target [Service] <...> and it worked as I hoped. Martin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel