> It appears that the systemctl implementation has changed the behaviour, > and the documentation. Whether there is a spec anywhere (POSIX or > whatever) I do not know - but certainly a man page is not a spec. systemd might still be UNIX compliant here, as https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/idx/utilities.html does not seem to include shutdown, meaning it is not covered by the standard. quick search gave me nothing by UNIX, POSIX, IEEE or OpenGroup. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
shutdown now --no-wall # messages & the lack thereof
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: shutdown now --no-wall # messages & the lack thereof
- From: "F. Fox" <firefox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:04:39 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20201008164428.55bcf659@acer-suse.lan>
- References: <5F7EFA68020000A10003BD0E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <78d3cbcf17099224becfcd371ebb0a9c@firemail.cc> <20201008164428.55bcf659@acer-suse.lan>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
- References:
- Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- From: Ulrich Windl
- Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- From: fox
- Re: Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- From: Dave Howorth
- Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- Prev by Date: Re: Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- Next by Date: Antw: [EXT] Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- Previous by thread: Re: Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- Next by thread: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: shutdown messages and the lack of such
- Index(es):
 |