On So, 20.09.20 16:09, Vitaly Repin (vitaly_repin@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the answer! > > However, it looks like that imjournal module is not an option for me. > > rsyslog imjournal module documentation > (https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/modules/imjournal.html) > clearly recommends to use imuxsock module in my case: > > [begin quote] > As such, the performance of a configuration utilizing this module may > be notably slower than when using imuxsock. > The journal provides imuxsock with a copy of all “classical” syslog > messages, however, it does not provide structured data. ' > Only if that structured data is needed, imjournal must be used. > Otherwise, imjournal may simply be replaced by imuxsock, and we highly > suggest doing so. > [end quote] > > I do not need structural data and I need performance. My system > generates a substantial amount of logs. I want to be able to store > messages with an arrival rate of 10 000 messages per second at > least. The rsyslog maintainer doesn't like systemd very much. Much of what he puts in the docs as big fat warnings is quite a bit FUDdy. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel