>>> Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 04.09.2020 um 17:44 in Nachricht <20200904154423.GM267847@gardel-login>: > On Fr, 04.09.20 17:10, Reindl Harald (h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> > No, that's not supported in sd‑boot. A boot loader is a boot loader, >> > it should contain a fragile storage stack. It's kinda what sd‑boot is >> > supposed to do better than grub. >> >> well, a boot loader should just *load* and not write anything so RAID1 >> is technically no problem and it shouldn't matter which of the 1, 2, 3 >> or 4 disks is there unless one survived. > > Robust boot loaders typically want to write boot counters to disk, so > that they can automatically revert back to older versions of the > OS/kernel if it doesn't boot. Thus some form of write access is > necessary if you care about robustness. Actually I think if the current kernel doesn't boot, it's the task of the system administrator to take recovery measures, not the boot loader. > > Lennart > > ‑‑ > Lennart Poettering, Berlin > _______________________________________________ > systemd‑devel mailing list > systemd‑devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd‑devel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel