This is the link:
Regards,
Shravan Singh
(239) 243-0838
Blue Sparq, Inc.
928 NE 24th Lane unit 4 and 5.
Cape Coral, FL 33993
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
Shravan Singh
(239) 243-0838
Blue Sparq, Inc.
928 NE 24th Lane unit 4 and 5.
Cape Coral, FL 33993
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:00 PM Dave Howorth <systemd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 21:32:19 +0200
Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fr, 04.09.20 14:10, Shravan Singh (shravan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> > Hello Lennart,
> >
> > Can you help me in understanding why this push was rejected?
> > *Make timedatectl nicely work with read-only filesystems #8277 *
>
> The explanation is in the PR comments.
Would either of you care to provide a link to the actual text you're
referring to, for people reading who are not intimately associated with
the code?
I can see why read-only rootfs might be desirable, and in an age of
mobile computing I can see why mutable timezones might also be
desirable.
> Lennart
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel