On Fr, 14.08.20 06:42, Harald Dunkel (harald.dunkel@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 8/13/20 11:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > No! It's a bug. Not in systemd, but LXC. But generating errors in such > > a borked setup is *good*, not bad, and certainly nothing to hide. > > > > Surely its not a bug in systemd, but ignoring unreasonable data (maybe with > a warning, if necessary) has a proud tradition in computing. Not to mention > that systemd ignores duplicate PIDs in the same context as well, AFAICS. > > Ignoring PID == 0 wouldn't be unreasonable, regardless whose bug this is. Well, we have to agree to disagree. We won't hide errors like this one in systemd. We Also, why even? If we'd ignore this specific error nothing for you would be fixed, because to host systemd instance and the one in the container will conflict with their cgroup use all the time. i.e. remove each other's cgroups at inconenient times, will not be able to detect correctly when a service is stopped, or get notified when it shuts down, because the cgroups it cares about won't be empty when they are supposed to be empty. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel