On Mo, 22.06.20 11:54, Florian Westphal (fw@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > BTW, is there any perspective of using sd-netlink as library backend > > for the interaction with the kernel side of things? > > I extended sd-netlink with support for nfnetlink for this to work, so > instead of RTNETLINK+GENETLINK there is now an nfnetlink backend as > well. Excellent! > >From your comments so far I would guess an acceptable solution would > be to retain the '--with-libiptc' switch, but build the > nfnetlink/nftables backend unconditionally. Yes, sounds excellent. > Then, if nftables initialisation fails (e.g. because kernel was > built without nftables support), fall back to libiptc/iptables-classic. Yes, perfect! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel