Re: Grouping services in systemd..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We had a similar problem and we solved it by using grouping for critical services and then using startup cpu shares for services that should be responsive within that group.

Even if you use startup cpu shares and create a target for everything you would want to boot, some unnecessary services will get the CPU due to CFS. Them getting CPU is by itself a problem, also they would cause a context switch with memory caches being flushed. To avoid this, we have created a target for our critical services and their dependencies. We had yet another service inside this critical group which told systemd to kick off multi-user.target when critical services were up. 

We didn't use startup IO shares because we are based on ubifs which back then didn't have IO scheduler support. 

Hope it gives some inspiration.
Umut

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:21 PM nitish nagesh <nagesh.nitish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks,

  We are working on an embedded ARM Cortex A9 based system (aka low CPU). It runs on a custom linux based operating system which uses systemd.

  We have a bunch of daemons (around ~50+) that come up during boot simultaneously which slows down the boot significantly as the CPU runs out of breath. We were thinking of staggering these daemons into 2 groups. The first group containing "critical" daemons (around 15) so that they finish faster and make the system usable sooner. Followed by the second group of daemons.

   Separating daemons into buckets could be done using: 
1) systemd targets: Introduce 2 new targets and classify the services/daemons into them. Layer these targets during boot.
2) Cgroups: Create a new systemd slice and put all the "critical" services into it. Allocate sufficient CPUShares value to the slice so that this slice gets its due CPU% to finish faster boot.

Can you please suggest which of the above is a better approach? Respective pros/cons with each.

Or if there is a third approach better than the above?

Thanks in advance,
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux