I've switched from distro networking stack (wicked) to systemd-network; generally, what a relief! The distro (opensuse leap 15.1) has 'old' systemd -- v234 As packaged, 'systemd-network.service' has "Also=systemd-networkd-wait-online.service". & 'systemd-networkd-wait-online.service' has "WantedBy=network-online.target" A number of my services depend on 'network-online.target'. All this^ is to say -- if 'network-online.target' is used, 'systemd-networkd-wait-online.service' gets launched. My box ALSO has a bridge defined. Which causes me to hit "systemd-networkd-wait-online fails with bridged interfaces" https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2154 on boot, [ 151.868637] systemd-networkd-wait-online[1394]: Event loop failed: Connection timed out [ 151.884034] systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE [ 151.885593] systemd[1]: Failed to start Wait for Network to be Configured. [ 151.885714] systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Unit entered failed state. [ 151.885741] systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. which causes significant delay systemd-analyze critical-chain multi-user.target @2min 50.841s └─... └─network-online.target @2min 19.876s └─network.target @19.712s └─systemd-networkd.service @19.268s +409ms └─network-pre.target @19.249s └─... The solution @bug is -- upgrade to systemd v242. On this distro, upstream refuses to upgrade systemd; apparently for them its 'non trivial' and they can't be bothered. AND, they've a new 'stable' version coming out AnyDayNow(tm), Leap 15.2, for which apparently systemd will REMAIN at broken-like-this^^ v234. So *my* solution has been to switch distros. NOT just for this^^ reason, but it was the last straw ... ~ 600 machines have finished migrating to other distros with newer systemd installs that avoid this problem. BUT -- I'm left with a few boxes that I can't move for awhile. So ... IS there a backport of this^^ fix available for v234 that popped up in the meantime? If not, as is likely, is there a "safe" workaround for quieting the fail, and rm'ing the associated boot delay? Is rm'ing either the "Also=" or "WantedBy=" a reasonable band-aid? Or, some other approach? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel