15.05.2020 12:57, Thomas HUMMEL пишет: > > In other words : is it a bad practice to order a home made service > before remote-fs-pre.target ? > Why would it be? The very reason remote-fs-pre.target was added is to allow services to be reliably started before remote mounts. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 09:16:14 +0300
- In-reply-to: <015c249e-7528-a51a-2a8c-4f5ef2ed308f@pasteur.fr>
- References: <64271b01-0853-2afe-bf2c-33664cb04a3b@pasteur.fr> <40779ae0-ae89-977a-5ebb-4ae22bdd5e9c@gmail.com> <015c249e-7528-a51a-2a8c-4f5ef2ed308f@pasteur.fr>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- From: Thomas HUMMEL
- Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- References:
- Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- From: Thomas HUMMEL
- Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- From: Andrei Borzenkov
- Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- From: Thomas HUMMEL
- Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- Prev by Date: Re: systemd update "forgets" ordering for shutdown
- Next by Date: How to silence systemd's "Starting", "Succeeded" and "Started" notifications?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- Next by thread: Re: Ordering a service before remote-fs-pre.target makes it quite longer
- Index(es):
 |