On Mo, 04.05.20 11:52, nitish nagesh (nagesh.nitish@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hello, > > We have this odd want to move a daemon between different systemd slices. > Not sure if that's even a valid thing to do, but here is the > requirement. The Linux kernel gets a bit confused with accounting if you migrate running processes between cgroups. One usually shouldn't do that except when forking off/execing new stuff. > The daemon while booting up belongs to a systemd slice (say X) which has > parameters like startupCPUShares tuned to bring the system up faster. > However for normal operations after bootup, it would be apt to make it > belong to another slice (say Y) with different cgroup parameters > configurations (ex: CPUShares). The set of daemons that belong to X and Y > are totally different, except for this one daemon. Also the cgroup > parameter that are set via slice Y are totally different than those set via > slice X. This is not supported. In systemd you can migrate services between slices only by stopping them and starting them again. > A few basic questions: > - Can a daemon be a part of 2 slices? no. > - If yes, going by the example above, if slice X loads first followed by > slice Y, does it mean when slice X is in force this daemon will have > startUpCPUShares set & when slice Y is loaded the CPUShares will be > set? I don't grok this, sorry. > Please suggest if there are alternate ways in systemd to handle this > requirement. We don't support that. Slice assignments are sticky during service runtime. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel