Re: Failed to determine supported controllers: No such process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Di, 21.01.20 17:14, Reindl Harald (h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> >> i was already considering "hidepid" as the root cause
> >> systemd-243.5-1.fc31.x86_64 other than
> >> systemd-241-12.git323cdf4.fc30.x86_64 can no longer deal with
> >
> > hidepid= is broken. We don't support that, sorry. Various components
> > can't deal with it.
> >
> > We'd like to support this, but the way it is defined now cannot work
> > for general purpose OS.
> >
> > There was work on fixing it in the kernel:
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/738597/
> >
> > That patch set got discussed, then forgotten, picked up again and
> > forgotten. it's a neverending story. If it eventualls gets merged we
> > can happily support it in systemd.
>
> don't get me wrong but after *years* using it on each and every machine
> from Fedora desktops over Feodra servers as well as with CentOS6/7 you
> can't come up with that when systemd got updated in F31 and point
> somewhere else

Well, maybe you didn't notice how broken it is, but I know it's
broken.

Either way, check if hidepid=0 makes things work for you.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux