On Fr, 27.09.19 19:26, Mantas Mikulėnas (grawity@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > That's the main problem. Only two of my several still-reasonably-modern > > x64 machines have TPMs, and one of them is TPM 1.2 which requires the > > completely unmaintained Trousers stack. > > As a side topic for systemd-homed, I kind of wish Linux had some actual > daemon that would take care of TPM stuff, like providing an API to > seal A small clarification: systemd-homed does not interface with the TPM. I am pretty sure it shouldn't. I think linking your OS storage to the TPM makes sense, but the user's data store not so much. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel