Am 27.08.19 um 14:45 schrieb Jérémy ROSEN: > Out of curiosity, and to check if I understand the systemd concepts > properly... > > assuming the two units to lock are both systemd services and are both of > type oneshot, would a simple After= of one on the other be enough to > guarantee they never run together ? surely given onshot continues finishs after the process exists _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:07:19 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAFvCimW4w0wuamP+76F6mrLuYcHcDuUH5vZdh73uh0v_Ar_aoQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Openpgp: id=9D2B46CDBC140A36753AE4D733174D5A5892B7B8; url=https://arrakis-tls.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
- Organization: the lounge interactive design
- References: <1035F105-3B14-446E-8FF4-403ADFB2F9D9@gmail.com> <20190827105559.GA6370@gardel-login> <CAFvCimW4w0wuamP+76F6mrLuYcHcDuUH5vZdh73uh0v_Ar_aoQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
- References:
- "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- From: Johannes Ernst
- Re: "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- From: Lennart Poettering
- Re: "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- From: Jérémy ROSEN
- "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- Prev by Date: Antw: Re: help: unmounting iscsi xfs filesystem without using netdev in /etc/fstab
- Next by Date: Re: help: unmounting iscsi xfs filesystem without using netdev in /etc/fstab
- Previous by thread: Re: "semaphore" for .timer-triggered run
- Next by thread: lto issues
- Index(es):
 |