Re: Wtrlt: Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

[Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Do, 09.05.19 15:52, Ulrich Windl (Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> (Sorry, I didn't sent to the list before)
> >>> Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 09.05.2019 um 14:25
> in Nachricht <5CD44C9A.ED38.00A1.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>> Michael Biebl <mbiebl@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 09.05.2019 um 12:26 in Nachricht
> > <CAGWsdOi_9z8XBrQTyh0wGNJxP3JZKhs8gQeRXvJPo3ZriLRdTw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Ulrich Windl
> > > <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > >> Despite of that I'm missing a "systemctl validate ..." command. That way I
> > > wouldn't need to execute start, status, stop, just to find out that some
> > > settings are rejected.
> > >
> > > There is "systemd-analyze verify".
>
> > That sounds interesting, but it seems I'll have to be root to use
> > it, and

These limitations where lifted a long time ago. Please update.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel