Re: Why ExecStop when service receives SIGTERM?

[Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 18.03.19 um 20:23 schrieb Felipe Gasper:
>> On Mar 18, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.03.19 um 19:27 schrieb Felipe Gasper:
>>> 	I’m noticing that ExecStop handlers execute not merely as a means for systemd to stop a Service but also when that Service’s main process receives SIGTERM.
>>>
>>> 	The documentation (systemd.service) says that ExecStop commands are how systemd stops the service; it’s not at all intuitive from that, IMO, that these would also run when something _else_ stops the service.
>>>
>>> 	Am I missing something in the documentation, or is this a bug?
>>>
>>> 	I’m running release 219.
>>
>> 219 sounds like CentOS/RHEL 7
>>
>> at least httpd has a patch for "type=notify" which also results in
>> "apachectl graceful" showing systemd service reload other than on
>> unpatched httpd
>>
>> so i guess that behavior has something to to with direct support of
>> systemd and type=notify
> 
> Yeah, I’m on CentOS 7.
> 
> Are you saying that this is a bug that later systemd releases have fixed?

no, i try to explain the behavior from my expierience and won't call it
a bug at all
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel