El Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:51:17 +0100 Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxx> escribió: > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 19:13 +0100, suscricions@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > El Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:18:40 +0100 > > > > There's been a reply in Arch Linux forums and at least I can apply > > some > > contingency measures. If it happens again I will provide more info > > following your advice. > > The log shows clearly that the device was available first: > > feb 06 12:07:09 systemd[1]: Starting File System Check > on /dev/disk/by-uuid/cabdab31-983b-401f-be30-dda0ae462080... feb 06 > 12:07:09 systemd-fsck[520]: multimedia: limpio, 1051/953984 ficheros, > 193506294/244189184 bloques feb 06 12:07:09 systemd[1]: Started File > System Check > on /dev/disk/by-uuid/cabdab31-983b-401f-be30-dda0ae462080. > > That wouldn't be possible without the device being visible to the > system. Shortly after you get > > feb 06 12:07:09 mount[544]: mount: /mnt/multimedia: el dispositivo > especial /dev/disk/by-uuid/cabdab31-983b-401f-be30-dda0ae462080 no > existe. > > ... So the device that had already been visible must have disappeared > temporarily. After the mount failure, we see messages about the LV > becoming active: > > [...] > feb 06 12:07:09 lvm[483]: 1 logical volume(s) in volume group > "storage" now active [...] > feb 06 12:07:09 lvm[494]: 1 logical volume(s) in volume group > "storage" now active > > There are two "lvm pvscan" processes (483 and 494) that may be > interfering with each other and/or with the "mount" process. These > processes are running on 8:17 (/dev/sdb1) and 254:1. I couldn't > figure out from your logs what this latter device might be. > > Wild guess: the pvscan processes working on the VG while it's already > visible are causing the device to get offline for a short time span, > and if the mount is attempted in that time window, the error occurs. > > There's another lvm process (340) started earlier by the lvm2-monitor > unit ("Monitoring of LVM2 mirrors, snapshots etc. using dmeventd or > progress polling."). Immediately after termination of this process, > the device seems to be detected by systemd and the above fsck/mount > sequence begins, while the pvscan processes are still running. "lvm2- > monitor.service" runs "vgchange --monitor y". It almost looks as if > this had caused the devices to be visible by systemd, but that would > be wrong AFAICT. > > Can you reproduce this with "udev.log-priority=debug"? > > Regards, > Martin > > > In /etc/udev/udev.conf with default values there's "udev_log=info" commented out. You mean changing logging levels here? Meantime I've pasted online info about my lvm scheme that could help. https://termbin.com/ipdq4 Best. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel