On Do, 17.01.19 14:35, Christopher Cox (ccox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 1/17/19 2:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Do, 17.01.19 12:38, Christopher Cox (ccox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > > > it defaults to YES and the whole discussions as that changed where about > > > > > nohup'd processes long ago > > > > > > > > Changing it to "no"... I'll let you know if this fixes things or not. > > > > > > > > > > Actually, as it turns out the nohup'd processes are all owned by root, so > > > changing to "no" didn't fix, but it's my understanding that if the setting > > > isn't set root is always excluded anyhow. > > > > The sessions of root are excluded, which is semantically slightly > > different from processes of root. > > > > > Out of the 18 processes that are > > > running, my script only sees 6 of them. Again, it's just doing a "ps -ef" > > > to a file. All 18 processes exist prior to shutdown and the script shows > > > that if I run manually. > > > > Which systemd version is this? Note that on old systemd versions > > systemd-user-sessions.service would go on its own killing spree early > > on. Maybe you have such an old version? > > Quite possible. This is CentOS 7.6 using what it calls "systemd-219-62" So, if you order your service After=systemd-user-sessions.service, does that change things? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel