Re: Requires and After

• Subject: Re: Requires and After
• From: Jérémy Rosen <jeremy.rosen@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:14:56 +0100
• In-reply-to: <20190101192414.GA100555@mother.pipebreaker.pl>
• References: <CAGVGHmvzQpQ2=yGRdUdTGkPPYDjUqW56zPB4HYYw2Q7CUXCe1Q@mail.gmail.com> <b1437265-9738-3fab-4ef4-6bbfb0ffb1c0@smile.fr> <q0gdbf$eka$1@blaine.gmane.org> <CAGVGHmvAqt4NczZRZ-_6+rUT1FN0O1ot6toXweyUVyEtBYFAgg@mail.gmail.com> <20190101192414.GA100555@mother.pipebreaker.pl>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

What's the benefit of not having After= for those services? I guess they can start and do their initialization in parallel with the service they require. In that case, what is the benefit or Requires vs Wants ? I might be missing something about what Requires does (shutdown ?) but at that point, Wants would be a better dependency, no ? -- 20 rue des Jardins 92600 Asnières-sur-Seine Jérémy ROSEN Architecte technique Responsable de l'expertise Smile-ECS jeremy.rosen@xxxxxxxx +33141402967 http://www.smile.eu Pour la planète, n'imprimez ce mail que si c'est nécessaire

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Requires and After
    • From: Michael Chapman

• References:
  • Requires and After
    • From: Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: Requires and After
    • From: Jérémy Rosen
  • Re: Requires and After
    • From: Ian Pilcher
  • Re: Requires and After
    • From: Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: Requires and After
    • From: Tomasz Torcz

• Prev by Date: Re: Requires and After
• Next by Date: Re: Requires and After
• Previous by thread: Re: Requires and After
• Next by thread: Re: Requires and After
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread