On Mo, 05.11.18 11:09, Daniel Wang (wonderfly@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently I realized that systemd-networkd implements its own Router > Advertisement and NDISC. While I am perfectly fine with using it, I > wonder what motivated it given that the Linux kernel already > implemented both. Is it features? Flexibility? Stability? for starters, if you want the DNS info embedded in it (and other stuff like that) then the in-kernel one won#t give it to you. > Also, what else in the ipv6 stack is duplicated in systemd-networkd? duplicated from what? I mean, the whole thing is a duplicate of NetworkManager if you so will, or of dhclient, and so on. Nothing networkd implements hasn't been implemented before. it just integrates stuff better, that's all. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel