Am 07.07.2018 um 14:35 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Tbh, I find it a bit confusing that we have three mechanisms now > (PrivateNetwork, RestrictAddressFamilies, IPAddressDeny) and when one > is supposed to use which one of these. why * PrivateNetwork -> big hammer service needs no network stuff at all * RestrictAddressFamilies -> finer hammer service must only talk local * IPAddressDeny/IPAddressAllow better way than iptables because it's for the whole process-group independent of users/groups and specific binaries can be combined with RestrictAddressFamilies RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_INET AF_INET6 IPAddressAllow=192.168.196.0/24
upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- From: h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Reindl Harald)
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 15:28:15 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAGWsdOgkvaqoG5btxT2u8kv6v+DE2NctaG6_AZU7jWAER1hBww@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAGWsdOjnghhyy50L=Qy2+po4vC_XHAzBL74rmegZkJ52CBfitA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPWNY8W885RZq=zk-jjGTzWhkEcuYYhDMBe7bRJmgJ1yVMAMaQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180706112355.GA25507@gardel-login> <CAGWsdOgkvaqoG5btxT2u8kv6v+DE2NctaG6_AZU7jWAER1hBww@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- From: Michael Biebl
- upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- From: Mantas Mikulėnas
- upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- From: Lennart Poettering
- upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- From: Michael Biebl
- upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- Prev by Date: Restarting a systemd service with new command line options from systemctl?
- Next by Date: Restarting a systemd service with new command line options from systemctl?
- Previous by thread: upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- Next by thread: upower fails with PrivateNetwork=true
- Index(es):
 |