Hi, On 13-06-18 17:05, Zbigniew JÄ?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:55:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 12-06-18 19:11, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Di, 12.06.18 11:33, Hans de Goede (hdegoede at redhat.com) wrote: >>>> AFAIK the service actually doing the updates is supposed to call >>>> systemctl reboot --force when it is done, so any targets after >>>> system-update.target won't get started ? >>> >>> True, the service in question could split the reboot call of course, >>> if it wanted, so that you can plug things in between. >> >> Since in this case we want to increment a boot_indeterminate counter >> to indicate the last boot was not a normal boot, so no clear >> success status is available I'm fine with the service doing the >> increment before the updates run. >> >> So I was thinking about adding a system-update-pre.target >> and then in system-update.target add: >> >> Wants=system-update-pre.target >> After=system-update-pre.target > Yep, that sounds reasonable. Ok, so as you've already seen I've just send a pull-req with this change: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9334 Given that we're going to need system-update-pre.target for Fedora 29: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu It would be great if this could still make the upcoming 239 release. But I guess it is too late for that? Assuming this is too late, I would like to request to carry this as a downstream patch in the Fedora pkgs for now. Regards, Hans