On Mi, 09.05.18 21:01, Chris Murphy (lists at colorremedies.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I see this in the journal > > May 09 14:36:06 f28h.local systemd-tmpfiles[3273]: > [/etc/tmpfiles.d/suspendfix.conf:7] Duplicate line for path > "/proc/acpi/wakeup", ignoring. > > This file contains: > > w /proc/acpi/wakeup - - - - PWRB > w /proc/acpi/wakeup - - - - XHC > > > They aren't really duplicate lines, as the lines themselves differ. > The paths involved are duplicates. I guess the obvious work around is > to use separate .conf files? Hmm, we currently don't cover the above nicely. What is the above actually supposed to do though? Should we really write the above in two separate open()+write()+close() cycles? or would it also work if the above is written as two newline separated lines within one open()+write()+close() cycle? If the latter we should really beef up tmpfiles to accept the usual C escapes in the argument parameter so that you could specifiy PWRB\nXHC as argument, in a single line... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat