[PATCH 4.1 034/267] ext4: fix fencepost error in lazytime optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

commit 0f0ff9a9f3fa2ec6f427603fd521d5f3a0b076d1 upstream.

Commit 8f4d8558391: "ext4: fix lazytime optimization" was not a
complete fix.  In the case where the inode number is a multiple of 16,
and we could still end up updating an inode with dirty timestamps
written to the wrong inode on disk.  Oops.

This can be easily reproduced by using generic/005 with a file system
with metadata_csum and lazytime enabled.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4360,7 +4360,12 @@ static void ext4_update_other_inodes_tim
 	int inode_size = EXT4_INODE_SIZE(sb);
 
 	oi.orig_ino = orig_ino;
-	ino = (orig_ino & ~(inodes_per_block - 1)) + 1;
+	/*
+	 * Calculate the first inode in the inode table block.  Inode
+	 * numbers are one-based.  That is, the first inode in a block
+	 * (assuming 4k blocks and 256 byte inodes) is (n*16 + 1).
+	 */
+	ino = ((orig_ino - 1) & ~(inodes_per_block - 1)) + 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < inodes_per_block; i++, ino++, buf += inode_size) {
 		if (ino == orig_ino)
 			continue;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]