4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 2b42b09b88c831ba4da2d669581dde371c38c2af upstream.
With commit: e1e455f4f4d3 (perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu
in glibc < 2.6), perf_bench numa mem with -c or -m option is not able to
correctly calculate convergence.
With the above commit, sched_getcpu always seems to return -1. The
intention of commit e1e455f was to add a sched_getcpu in glibc < 2.6.
Hence keep the sched_getcpu definition under an ifdef.
This regression happened occurred between v4.0 and v4.1
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e1e455f4f4d3 ("perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu in glibc < 2.6")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150624111004.GA5220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/cloexec.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
@@ -7,11 +7,15 @@
static unsigned long flag = PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC;
+#ifdef __GLIBC_PREREQ
+#if !__GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 6)
int __weak sched_getcpu(void)
{
errno = ENOSYS;
return -1;
}
+#endif
+#endif
static int perf_flag_probe(void)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html