This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-reservation-release-on-invalidatepage-for-delalloc-fs.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 9705acd63b125dee8b15c705216d7186daea4625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 21:13:55 -0400
Subject: ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 9705acd63b125dee8b15c705216d7186daea4625 upstream.
On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation
in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed
buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent
status tree.
However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size >
block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page
regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page.
This leads to the errors like this:
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225:
ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data
blocks
This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is
in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones
else delayed buffer.
Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the
page we want to invalidate.
This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was
only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older.
[global]
bs=8k
iodepth=1024
iodepth_batch=60
randrepeat=1
size=1m
directory=/mnt/test
numjobs=20
[job1]
ioengine=sync
bs=1k
direct=1
rw=randread
filename=file1:file2
[job2]
ioengine=libaio
rw=randwrite
direct=1
filename=file1:file2
[job3]
bs=1k
ioengine=posixaio
rw=randwrite
direct=1
filename=file1:file2
[job5]
bs=1k
ioengine=sync
rw=randread
filename=file1:file2
[job7]
ioengine=libaio
rw=randwrite
filename=file1:file2
[job8]
ioengine=posixaio
rw=randwrite
filename=file1:file2
[job10]
ioengine=mmap
rw=randwrite
bs=1k
filename=file1:file2
[job11]
ioengine=mmap
rw=randwrite
direct=1
filename=file1:file2
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static void ext4_da_page_release_reserva
unsigned int offset,
unsigned int length)
{
- int to_release = 0;
+ int to_release = 0, contiguous_blks = 0;
struct buffer_head *head, *bh;
unsigned int curr_off = 0;
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
@@ -1363,14 +1363,23 @@ static void ext4_da_page_release_reserva
if ((offset <= curr_off) && (buffer_delay(bh))) {
to_release++;
+ contiguous_blks++;
clear_buffer_delay(bh);
+ } else if (contiguous_blks) {
+ lblk = page->index <<
+ (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
+ lblk += (curr_off >> inode->i_blkbits) -
+ contiguous_blks;
+ ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, contiguous_blks);
+ contiguous_blks = 0;
}
curr_off = next_off;
} while ((bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
- if (to_release) {
+ if (contiguous_blks) {
lblk = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
- ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, to_release);
+ lblk += (curr_off >> inode->i_blkbits) - contiguous_blks;
+ ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, contiguous_blks);
}
/* If we have released all the blocks belonging to a cluster, then we
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.1/ext4-fix-reservation-release-on-invalidatepage-for-delalloc-fs.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html