This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000 Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream. The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_ if (producer_fifo >= 0) { struct sched_param param = { - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo + .sched_priority = producer_fifo }; sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); } else Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.0/ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in