On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:14:01AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I take the blame for any problems with Outreachy patches. Given the
> huge volume of them, one bug out of 900 isn't that bad of a percentage.
We don't get many bugs through outreachy, but this isn't the first one.
For example, in March and April people complained about:
95745e9b1de2 ('staging: lustre: Use kasprintf.')
45de432775d6 ('Staging: rtl8712: Use memdup_user() instead of copy_from_user()')
There have been others but I have a short memory. We have this
discussion every time. How come no one caught this bug in review?? Oh,
it never went through the list.
I'm fine with 5 bugs per 900 patches or whatever. I wish that the
patches came to the list, but I get that that would double your review
workload to review 900 patches on the outreachy list and again on the
normal dev list.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html