Commit c80e5c0c23ce2282476fdc64c4b5e3d3a40723fd upstream.
This is the backport of that fix for 3.16.y-3.18.y.
On x86-64, __copy_instruction() always returns 0 (error) if the
instruction uses %rip-relative addressing. This is because
kernel_insn_init() is called the second time for 'insn' instance
in such cases and sets all its fields to 0.
Because of this, trying to place a kprobe on such instruction
will fail, register_kprobe() will return -EINVAL.
This patch fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 93d2c04..f2e281c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -330,13 +330,16 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
{
struct insn insn;
kprobe_opcode_t buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+ int length;
kernel_insn_init(&insn, (void *)recover_probed_instruction(buf, (unsigned long)src));
insn_get_length(&insn);
+ length = insn.length;
+
/* Another subsystem puts a breakpoint, failed to recover */
if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)
return 0;
- memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, insn.length);
+ memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, length);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (insn_rip_relative(&insn)) {
@@ -366,7 +369,7 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
*(s32 *) disp = (s32) newdisp;
}
#endif
- return insn.length;
+ return length;
}
static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
--
2.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html