Re: a old issue of ext4 on lts 3.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/15/2015 04:36 AM, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> > Hi Dmitry&Theodore,
>> >
>> > Someone said without the following patch on lts 3.10 kernel (which used
>> > as android base kernel). the write maybe very very slow, needs 1 or 2
>> > seconds to finish.
> In fact this was an optimization.
> wait_for_stable_page() is actually and optimized wait_on_page_writeback()

Hi, Dimtry, it *is* a optimization, the fault is just happened *without*
this patch, not with this. :)
The curious for me is why this patch has this effect. It looks like the
new func just wait page wb when the device support data integrity. But
Why the data integrity device need to wait wb, while other device don't
need?

BTW,
how to know if my disk support data integrity. My harddisk spec said it
has this feature, but my linux kernel with integrity supported don't
have /sys/block/sdx/integrity.

Thanks a lots for your quick response!
> 
> see:
> void wait_for_stable_page(struct page *page)
> {
>         struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
>                 struct backing_dev_info *bdi =
>                 mapping->backing_dev_info;
> 
>         if (!bdi_cap_stable_pages_required(bdi))
>                         return;
> 
>         wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> }
> It is very unlikely the patch provokes such huge slowdown.
> Can you please repeat your measurements and double check your evidence.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]