3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 19fc99d0c6ba7d9b65456496b5bb2169d5f74cd0 upstream. In that case, emit_udiv() will be called with rn == ARM_R0 (r_scratch) and loading rm first into ARM_R0 will result in jit_udiv() function being called the same dividend and divisor. Fix that by loading rn first into ARM_R1 and then rm into ARM_R0. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: aee636c4809f (bpf: do not use reciprocal divide) Acked-by: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -449,10 +449,21 @@ static inline void emit_udiv(u8 rd, u8 r return; } #endif - if (rm != ARM_R0) - emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, rm), ctx); + + /* + * For BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K instructions, rm is ARM_R4 + * (r_A) and rn is ARM_R0 (r_scratch) so load rn first into + * ARM_R1 to avoid accidentally overwriting ARM_R0 with rm + * before using it as a source for ARM_R1. + * + * For BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X rm is ARM_R4 (r_A) and rn is + * ARM_R5 (r_X) so there is no particular register overlap + * issues. + */ if (rn != ARM_R1) emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R1, rn), ctx); + if (rm != ARM_R0) + emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, rm), ctx); ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL; emit_mov_i(ARM_R3, (u32)jit_udiv, ctx); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html