This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send
to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
btrfs-unlock-i_mutex-after-attempting-to-delete-subvolume-during-send.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 909e26dce3f7600f5e293ac0522c28790a0c8c9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 909e26dce3f7600f5e293ac0522c28790a0c8c9c upstream.
Whenever the check for a send in progress introduced in commit
521e0546c970 (btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send) is
hit, we return without unlocking inode->i_mutex. This is easy to see
with lockdep enabled:
[ +0.000059] ================================================
[ +0.000028] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[ +0.000029] 4.0.0-rc5-00096-g3c435c1 #93 Not tainted
[ +0.000026] ------------------------------------------------
[ +0.000029] btrfs/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
[ +0.000029] 1 lock held by btrfs/211:
[ +0.000023] #0: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8135b8df>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy+0x2df/0x7a0
Make sure we unlock it in the error path.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_des
"Attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
dest->root_key.objectid);
err = -EPERM;
- goto out_dput;
+ goto out_unlock_inode;
}
d_invalidate(dentry);
@@ -2498,6 +2498,7 @@ out_up_write:
root_flags & ~BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
}
+out_unlock_inode:
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (!err) {
shrink_dcache_sb(root->fs_info->sb);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.0/btrfs-unlock-i_mutex-after-attempting-to-delete-subvolume-during-send.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html