On 7 May 2015 at 04:25, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/06/2015 10:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 5 May 2015 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. >>>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> >>> -rc2 is out now that should work properly: >>> >>> >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz >> >> >> The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a >> variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot >> bisection which yielded... >> > > Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ? With qemu-system 2.2... 'qemu-system-arm -machine help' does not list any at91 based machine types. :( > > Guenter > Cheers, Tyler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html