Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: loop: avoiding too many pending per work I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:17:33PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> But I still prefer to dio/aio approach because double cache can
>> be avoided, which is a big win in my previous tests.
>
> Can yo respin and resend the patches?  With Al's iov_iter work and my
> kiocb changes it should be fairly easy and non-intrusive to do.

I will post them later.

thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]