3.2.69-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
commit 2bf4c1d483d911cda5dd385527194d23e5cea73d upstream.
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/adav80x.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int adav80x_put_deemph(struct snd
{
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct adav80x *adav80x = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- unsigned int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
+ unsigned int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (deemph > 1)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int adav80x_get_deemph(struct snd
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct adav80x *adav80x = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = adav80x->deemph;
+ ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = adav80x->deemph;
return 0;
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html