3.2.69-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> commit e8371aa0fecb73fb8a4b2e0296b025b11e7d6229 upstream. The correct values referred by a boolean control are value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[]. The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible on 64bit architectures. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/codecs/cs4271.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs4271.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs4271.c @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int cs4271_get_deemph(struct snd_ struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); struct cs4271_private *cs4271 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = cs4271->deemph; + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = cs4271->deemph; return 0; } @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int cs4271_put_deemph(struct snd_ struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); struct cs4271_private *cs4271 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); - cs4271->deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; + cs4271->deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]; return cs4271_set_deemph(codec); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html