On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 12:17 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 09.04.2015 um 10:44 schrieb lizf@xxxxxxxxxx:
> > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > 3.4.107-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> >
> > commit 2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603 upstream.
>
> Hmmm, I just realized that this patch only makes a difference with
>
> commit d3d692c82e4ed79ae7c85f8825ccfdb7d11819da ("KVM: s390: implement KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH and make use of it")
>
> It should not hurt to have this patch as far as I can tell,
> but it makes no difference. This is also true for other
> stable versions < 3.18 - sorry for noticing it that late.
>
> commit d3d692c82e4ed79ae7c85f8825ccfdb7d11819da on the other hand
> is not that easy to backport into Linux versions < 3.16.
>
> So maybe just drop this patch?
I also mistakenly applied this to 3.2 and will revert it in the next
update.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part