On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Maybe just cap max_active to NR_OF_LOOP_DEVS * 16 or sth? But idk, > > how many concurrent workers are we talking about and why are we > > capping per-queue concurrency from worker pool side instead of command > > tag side? > > Also we probably should have per device workqueues to start with.. Yeah, that's an option. The only thing is that each workqueue would have to be tagged WQ_RESCUER and end up with separate rescuer task, which usually isn't big a deal but there are setups where a lot of loop devices are used and it may sting a bit. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html