Re: [PATCH] block: loop: avoiding too many pending per work I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> If there are too many pending per work I/O, too many
>>>> high priority work thread can be generated so that
>>>> system performance can be effected.
>>>>
>>>> This patch limits the max pending per work I/O as 16,
>>>> and will fackback to single queue mode when the max
>>>> number is reached.
>>>
>>> Actually, it limits it to 32.  Also, there is no discussion on what
>>> variables might affect this number.  Will that magic number change
>>> depending on the number of cpus on the system, for example?
>>
>> My fault, it should have been 16.
>>
>> It is just used to keep more IOs in flight, but can't cause obvious
>> costs like the case of Fedora live booting.
>>
>> IMO, it shouldn't depend much on number of CPUs, and more
>> related with I/O performance of the backing file, and the number
>> is like 'iodepth' of fio.
>
> OK, that makes more sense.  I'm still not a huge fan of hard-coding
> numbers that are storage-specific, but I don't have a better suggestion
> at the moment, either.

OK, thanks for your review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]