On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:44:18PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Unregister GPIOs requested through sysfs at chip remove to avoid leaking
> > the associated memory and sysfs entries.
> >
> > The stale sysfs entries prevented the gpio numbers from being exported
> > when the gpio range was later reused (e.g. at device reconnect).
> >
> > This also fixes the related module-reference leak.
> >
> > Note that kernfs makes sure that any on-going sysfs operations finish
> > before the class devices are unregistered and that further accesses
> > fail.
> >
> > The chip exported flag is used to prevent gpiod exports during removal.
> > This also makes it harder to trigger, but does not fix, the related race
> > between gpiochip_remove and export_store, which is really a race with
> > gpiod_request that needs to be addressed separately.
> >
> > Also note that this would prevent the crashes (e.g. NULL-dereferences)
> > at reconnect that affects pre-3.18 kernels, as well as use-after-free on
> > operations on open attribute files on pre-3.14 kernels (prior to
> > kernfs).
> >
> > Fixes: d8f388d8dc8d ("gpio: sysfs interface")
> > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v2.6.27: 01cca93a9491
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Patch applied for fixes.
>
> I worry a bit about what userspaces do out there, but they
> cannot reasonably have behaviours tied to in-flight removal
> of GPIO chips, that would be bizarre.
You shouldn't worry too much; even before this patch userspace would see
an -ENODEV when accessing an open sysfs attribute file of a disconnected
device as kernfs would orphan the file -- only now without the associated
leaks and crashes. ;)
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html