3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anton Nayshtut <anton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f5e2dc5d7fe78fe4d8748d217338f4f7b6a5d7ea ]
Before commit 3900f29021f0bc7fe9815aa32f1a993b7dfdd402 ("bonding: slight
optimizztion for bond_slave_override()") the override logic was to send packets
with non-zero queue_id through the slave with corresponding queue_id, under two
conditions only - if the slave can transmit and it's up.
The above mentioned commit changed this logic by introducing an additional
condition - whether the bond is active (indirectly, using the slave_can_tx and
later - bond_is_active_slave), that prevents the user from implementing more
complex policies according to the Documentation/networking/bonding.txt.
Signed-off-by: Anton Nayshtut <anton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Bogoslavsky <alexey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3797,7 +3797,8 @@ static inline int bond_slave_override(st
/* Find out if any slaves have the same mapping as this skb. */
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
if (slave->queue_id == skb->queue_mapping) {
- if (bond_slave_can_tx(slave)) {
+ if (bond_slave_is_up(slave) &&
+ slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, slave->dev);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html