Hi, On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:56:25PM -0700, David Cohen wrote: > > > > > When going into bus suspend/resume we _must_ > > > > > call gadget driver's ->suspend/->resume callbacks > > > > > accordingly. This patch implements that very feature > > > > > which has been missing forever. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.14 > > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > This patch was introduced on v3.15. > > > > > But the issue it fixes already existed on v3.14 and v3.14 is a long term > > > > > support version. > > > > > > > > Can you show me a log of this breaking anywhere ? Why do you consider > > > > this a bug fix ? What sort of drawbacks did you notice ? > > > > > > We're seeing BC1.2 compliance test failure. I borrowed this info from > > > the bug report :) > > > > > > 1. BC1.2 compliance testing - SDP2.0 > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > > 1. On Connect to active Host (Expected result: 100mA to 500mA): > > > Actual result 100mA to 500mA > > > > > > 2. On Host Suspend (ER: Fall back to 0mA): > > > not falling back to 0mA, remains at 500mA > > > > > > 3. On Connect to Suspended Host (ER: 100mA to 0mA): > > > cable-props shown as 100mA, which means drawing a current of 100mA from > > > Suspended Host > > > > > > 4. On making Host active (ER: 500mA): > > > 500mA > > > > But we don't support Battery Charging with dwc3 as of now :-) In fact, > > just note that none of the BC registers are even defined in the current > > driver anywhere. Seems like you should cherry-pick these to your vendor > > tree, but v3.14 vanilla, because it doesn't support BC1.2, can't be > > claimed to be at fault, right ? > > We could call it a missing feature that could lead to a potential bug :) > By your own comment, he "must" was stressed out: sure it was because they really must be called :-) However, the only actual problem that arises from not calling them is with something that's not supported :-) > When going into bus suspend/resume we _must_ > call gadget driver's ->suspend/->resume callbacks > accordingly. This patch implements that very feature > which has been missing forever. > ''' > > Since v3.14 is a LTS kernel and the changes are safe, it's worth to > consider. definitely worth to consider, but not as something that fixes BC1.2 because that's, as said, not supported in any public tree :-) > > I'll leave the final decision to Greg and I don't really oppose having > > both patches on v3.14-stable, but this is not a bug fix in my view. > > Thanks. I appreciate your feedback. > > BR, David > > PS: FWIW implementing features or fixing bugs aren't much different tasks: > https://geekwhisperin.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/bug-vs-feature.jpg Yes, I used to have that on my office door ;-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature