From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit b4a18c8b1af15ebfa9054a3d2aef7b0a7e6f2a05 upstream.
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index 942ef8427347..2a0bfb848512 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int wm8960_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8960_priv *wm8960 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8960->deemph;
+ ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8960->deemph;
return 0;
}
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int wm8960_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
{
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8960_priv *wm8960 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
+ int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (deemph > 1)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html