On 06/04/2015 22:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On 04/02/2015 11:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> If we were migrated right after __getcpu, but before reading the >>> migration_count, we wouldn't notice that we read TSC of a different >>> VCPU, nor that KVM's bug made pvti invalid, as only migration_count >>> on source VCPU is increased. >>> >>> Change vdso instead of updating migration_count on destination. >> >> Looks good to me. > > Just to check: what tree is this intended to go through? I can take it, > but not until the previous patch makes it into Linus' tree or -tip. Or > I can take both patches. I'll take it for 4.1. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html