On 03/25/2015 07:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:39:23PM -0800, David Daney wrote:From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt b/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt index aee73e7..82c097a 100644 --- a/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt +++ b/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree: in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author or subsystem maintainer. + - The kernel versions, to which the patch should be applied, can be + specified in the following format in the sign-off area: + + Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x + + The tag has the meaning of: + git cherry-pick <this commit> + + For each "-stable" tree starting with the specified version. + - If the patch requires other patches as prerequisites which can be cherry-picked, then this can be specified in the following format in the sign-off area: -- 1.7.11.7This doesn't apply to the tree, what kernel version did you make it against? Can you make it against Linus's latest tree and resend it?
I just sent out a new version. David Daney -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html