This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/apic/numachip: Fix sibling map with NumaChip to the 3.19-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: x86-apic-numachip-fix-sibling-map-with-numachip.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.19 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From c8a470cab030bae8f9e6e5cfff72b047b7c627a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:55:13 +0100 Subject: x86/apic/numachip: Fix sibling map with NumaChip From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit c8a470cab030bae8f9e6e5cfff72b047b7c627a7 upstream. On NumaChip systems, the physical processor ID assignment wasn't accounting for the number of nodes in AMD multi-module processors, giving an incorrect sibling map: $ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology $ grep . * core_id:5 core_siblings:00000000,ff000000 core_siblings_list:24-31 physical_package_id:3 thread_siblings:00000000,30000000 thread_siblings_list:28-29 This fixes it: $ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology $ grep . * core_id:5 core_siblings:00000000,ffff0000 core_siblings_list:16-31 physical_package_id:1 thread_siblings:00000000,30000000 thread_siblings_list:28-29 Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Steffen Persvold <sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426135950-10110-1-git-send-email-daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c @@ -37,10 +37,12 @@ static const struct apic apic_numachip; static unsigned int get_apic_id(unsigned long x) { unsigned long value; - unsigned int id; + unsigned int id = (x >> 24) & 0xff; - rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value); - id = ((x >> 24) & 0xffU) | ((value << 2) & 0xff00U); + if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value); + id |= (value << 2) & 0xff00; + } return id; } @@ -155,10 +157,18 @@ static int __init numachip_probe(void) static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node) { - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) { - c->phys_proc_id = node; - per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node; + u64 val; + u32 nodes = 1; + + this_cpu_write(cpu_llc_id, node); + + /* Account for nodes per socket in multi-core-module processors */ + if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, val); + nodes = ((val >> 3) & 7) + 1; } + + c->phys_proc_id = node / nodes; } static int __init numachip_system_init(void) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-3.19/x86-apic-numachip-fix-sibling-map-with-numachip.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html